Michael Sanilevich (Mushi): CEO of the organization — Mr. pose and reality
The leader’s family: pose and reality
The movement positions itself as a bearer of light, correction, and good. Let’s look at the outward signs.
Laitman. Abandoned by his wife. Olga — that’s her name — completely avoids any contact with him for over 30 years. The only contact is financial: she receives money from him (allegedly his salary). Meanwhile she lives alone in a new five-room apartment that Laitman bought for her in the Em Ha-Mashavot area. She could live in a far more modest place — three decades alone, “unity” and “giving” according to the organization’s narrative. Instead — five rooms at the structure’s expense. What “family” and “unity” are we talking about?
Son-in-law — Mushi. Formally the CEO. Married to Laitman’s eldest daughter. Yael rejected him. On social media he hides his family status and posts not a single photo of his son, not a single family photo — and yet we’re entitled to expect from a “teacher of modesty” at least the image of a normal family: husband, wife and son spending time together at least sometimes and not ashamed to show it. Right?
And what do we see? Mushi lives it up alone — where’s the family?
Meanwhile he has no qualms showing another picture: expensive trips, resorts, gear. Judging by his posts — a man who denies himself nothing. Does anyone seriously believe this is a “teacher of modesty”?
The leader’s younger daughter — Rachel. According to open sources she holds control over the organization’s financial flow. The very “family” that, by the movement’s narrative, carries “correction” and “good.”
One contrast: narrative — “light and good”; facts — broken families, hidden statuses, control over money. Who’s fooling whom?
Mushi on social media: image and contrast
While rank-and-file followers of the movement make ends meet year after year, CEO Mushi broadcasts on Facebook the life of someone who is denied nothing.
Illustrations (photos from Mushi’s Facebook)
Mushi flies to a ski resort by helicopter. Not a bus, not a carpool. A helicopter. This isn’t “modesty” or “ego nullification” — it’s a display of access to the organization’s money.
Dubai vacation: expensive restaurants and hotels. A lifestyle out of reach for a rank-and-file member of the structure who has been counting shekels for decades.
Trips to attractions, leisure with no regard for budget. Again — not how the average follower of “Kabbalah Laam” lives.
Bike with gear: helmet, glasses, equipment well above standard in price and level. Not “just sport” — a display of status and wealth.
Photo 5 — Ski resort every year
Ski resort — year after year. Not “modesty” — the CEO’s accustomed standard of living.
Every such post is a blow to the narrative. The movement preaches “unity,” “giving,” “correction.” The CEO shows: helicopters, Dubai, expensive gear. Whom to believe — words or pictures?
Minimum wage — for workers. For the son-in-law — “living the high life”
Organization workers get minimum wage — according to open data and reviews, that’s how the structure works. Minimum for rank and file, tithes from members, multi-million turnover a year.
Mushi meanwhile lives like a king. Helicopters, Dubai, expensive gear, leisure with no regard for budget. How does the CEO live so much better than any rank-and-file member on minimum wage? The question isn’t rhetorical — it’s for those who still believe in “equal distribution” and “giving.”
Divorces, alimony, rank-and-file members — and Mushi
According to available data, among followers divorces happen noticeably more often than the national average. Inside the structure people mix and swap partners — husbands and wives. Alimony eats up most of the salary; today alimony isn’t pocket change but a substantial share of income. After divorce and payments a rank-and-file member has practically no chance at a normal life. There are very many such — more than 60% of all adherents.
Mushi meanwhile lives mysteriously several times better than anyone. Rejected by his wife, formally in the same system — but helicopters, Dubai, expensive gear. Does no one have questions? One contrast: rank-and-file divorced member — alimony, minimum, making ends meet; CEO — luxury on social media. Where does the gap come from if the budget is shared?
Buying peace of mind: hidden spending from the common budget
The organization lives on tithes, donations, and rank-and-file labor at minimum wage. Laitman, his son-in-law Mushi, and daughter Rachel buy themselves peace of mind one way: they hide how much money they spend on themselves alone from this common budget. A five-room apartment for the wife who has lived alone for thirty years. Helicopters and Dubai for the son-in-law while workers get minimum wage. Control of finances with the daughter while rank and file face divorce and poverty. No transparency — only a facade of “light” and “good” and unaccounted spending by the family at the helm. Whoever asks questions is no longer “one of us.”
Narrative and what’s visible from the outside
The movement’s leadership declares: we bring light, correction, good. The question isn’t about intentions — it’s about outward signs.
If this is a system of “giving and equality,” why is it so consistently beneficial to some and destructive to others?
Are there really people who want to be like them? Does anyone still believe this is “correction” and “good”?
The conclusion suggests itself. What has been presented for years as a “spiritual organization” and “movement of correction” in fact behaves like a sect: a closed structure, double standards, money and comfort at the top with minimum and broken lives at the bottom. Words — about light. Pictures — about helicopters. You can call it many things. Sect — not an insult, but a logical description of what’s visible to the naked eye.
Share your story anonymously
Write to us at: LAITMAN.HUI@MAIL.RU